 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
The Soon Coming Judgment Of God Upon America and How To Escape It 443
thrown hundreds of feet in all directions. If the upper floors toppled over, they would have fallen
like a tree but remained largely intact.
Dr. Griffin describes the collapse of WTC 2:
The uppermost floors—above the level struck by the airplane—began
tipping toward the corner most damaged by the impact. According to
conservation-of-momentum laws, this block of approximately 34 floors should
have fallen to the ground far outside the building’s footprint. “However,” observe
Paul and Hoffman, “as the top then began to fall, the rotation decelerated. Then it
reversed direction [even though the] law of conservation of angular momentum
states that a solid object in rotation will continue to rotate at the same speed
unless acted on by a torque” (Paul and Hoffman, 2004, p. 34).
1690
Dr. Jones with his expertise in physics further describes the collapse of WTC 2 as
follows:
We observe that approximately 30 upper floors begin to rotate as a block,
to the south and east. They begin to topple over, as favored by the Law of
Increasing Entropy. The torque due to gravity on this block is enormous, as is its
angular momentum. But then – and this I’m still puzzling over – this block turned
mostly to powder in mid-air! How can we understand this strange behavior,
without explosives? Remarkable, amazing – and demanding scrutiny since the US
government-funded reports failed to analyze this phenomenon. But, of course, the
Final NIST 9-11 report “does not actually include the structural behavior of
the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached.” (NIST,
2005, p. 80, fn. 1; emphasis added.)
1691
Did you get that? The NIST report never considered the evidence of what actually
occurred when the towers fell. That is like a detective investigating a murder stating—I'm not
interested in what happened to the bullet after it left the gun, it's not relevant! What happens after
a bullet leaves the gun barrel is just as relevant as what happened as the towers fell!
NIST did not consider the very strange behavior of the building during the collapse
because it can only be explained by the use of explosives. To experts in controlled building
demolition the collapse wasn't strange at all. This typical behavior is described by Mark
Loizeaux, the head of Controlled Demolition, Inc.; he states:
[B]y differentially controlling the velocity of failure in different parts of
the structure, you can make it walk, you can make it spin, you can make it
dance.... We'll have structures start facing north and end up going to the north-
west.
1692
A New York Times article notes other peculiar behavior in the collapse of WTC 1. They
 |