 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
The Soon Coming Judgment Of God Upon America and How To Escape It 446
and so I quote him with no knowledge of his accuracy. According to his calculations the FEMA
design accounted for 32,000 tons (64 million pounds) less steel than was actually used in each
towers construction. He concluded: “that the 32,000 tons of steel unaccounted for, is due to the
fact the the floor joists were actually weighty steel beams and not flimsy trusses (and thus that
the official story is a lie spun to explain away what were obviously demolitions).”
1701
I don't
agree with his conclusion entirely. It seems quite certain that floor trusses were part of the design
but it appears there were either twice as many trusses or steel beams between the trusses.
In a critique of Chapter 2 of FEMA's report the unknown author further writes:
One also wonders why the pile of steel in the foreground was hoisted up
the building, unless it was to be incorporated in the structure....You may wish to
compare the above floor plan with this one taken from... Multi-Storey Buildings
in Steel... The differences are quite telling....
The people who designed the towers were not fools and knew all this.
They designed the towers to survive much more serious fires than those that
occurred on September 11....
To believe the silly little tale you are being told here, you must believe
that the designers were fools and did not follow the law and design a building that
could resist a serious multi-floor office fire. Note, that if the above scenario is
correct then the towers would collapse in the event of any such fire. The aircraft
impact plays no significant role in the sad little tale told here, only the fire....
The fact that the towers collapsed in 8-10 seconds (essentially free-fall) is
massive evidence that they were deliberately demolished. The fact that they fell at
such a rate means that they did not encounter any resistance from the supposedly
undamaged parts of the structure. That is, no resistance was encountered from any
of the immensely strong parts of the structure that held the building up in the first
place. From this one can conclude that the lower “undamaged” parts were actually
very damaged (probably by a multitude of small explosive charges as in a
controlled demolition).
1702
The Pancake Theory Exposed As Fraud
There is much that can be learned from observing the actual video footage of the
collapse of the twin towers. Video footage of most crime scenes would be extraordinarily
helpful. Video has its limitations, it doesn't necessarily show the whole picture but it does
provide critical pieces to the puzzle. In the case of the WTC collapses, video can tell us what
didn't happen. Dave Heller, a builder with degrees in physics and architecture explains what the
video reveals to him. He represents many others who have made similar observations. He states:
...the floors could not have been pancaking. The buildings fell too quickly.
The floors must all have been falling simultaneously to reach the ground in such a
short amount of time. But how?. . . In [the method known as controlled
demolition], each floor of a building is destroyed at just the moment the floor
 |