 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
The Soon Coming Judgment Of God Upon America and How To Escape It 336
Fed Up with the Legal System: What’s Wrong & How to Fix It, write that “critics more cogently
point out that the best way to predict which side will win a particular case is to know the politics
and prejudices of the judge, not the intricacies of the law.”
1319
In fact one of the most valuable
skills an attorney can have is the ability to get their case before the judge that they believe will be
most favorable to their case.
The Legal System
Judicial Corruption
Unfortunately, there is little or no protection from a judge who is amoral, even evil and
who desires to bring chaos to our system of law. Our system of appeals is to assure that the law
has been properly applied. There is generally no appeal available when a judge misrepresents the
facts of a case. This can happen through incompetence or through what is known as Judicial
Perjury! This is a purposeful misrepresentation of the facts (lying). Once the facts have been
misrepresented, they become part of the court record. The judge can then apply case law to the
fictitious facts to arrive at his desired decision. A judge can engage in judicial perjury because of
his own biases, because of bribes, or because of other outside influences.
Judges have many methods whereby they can commit judicial perjury. They can out right
lie about the facts, or they can exclude pertinent evidence from the case, or they can admit
unfactual evidence into the case. These can enable him to knowingly and willfully present an
improper decision that will stand up against appeal. All the judge needs to do is phrase his
decision properly and properly apply the law because generally an appeal is not accepted based
on factual errors. This most likely occurs much more often than anyone is aware or willing to
admit. Between 1993 and 1999, the Center for Judicial Accountability, Inc. filed hundred of
impeachment complaints against federal judges which it says the House Judiciary Committee has
failed to act on.
1320
The most important thing to understand is not how often it happens now but
that it is possible and it does happen!
In jury trials, the judge also provides instruction to the jury which can be used to sway the
juries opinion. Former Oklahoma State Representative Charles Key says that “the true purpose of
a jury is to prevent oppression by government.” He states that this was the opinion of an
overwhelming number of the founding fathers and early Supreme Court justices. John Jay, one of
our first Supreme Court justices said: “The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the
facts in controversy.” In like manner “John Adams said it was the jury's responsibility to judge
not only the facts but the law itself.” But this is not what is happening today. The judge typically
asks the jury, “Are you willing to follow my instructions on the law.” Keys further states that
“there have been many efforts to eliminate jury trials altogether. In fact to a certain extent they
have been eliminated.” This is because of changes in jury selection, rules of evidence, and
instruction. These changes have been made to make it easier to get convictions.
1321
Attorney Generals
The Attorney General of the United States “heads the Department of Justice and
represents the government in legal matters. The responsibilities of this office include enforcing
federal laws, particularly criminal statutes.”
1322
The Attorney Generals of each state provide
 |