 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
The Soon Coming Judgment Of God Upon America and How To Escape It 459
and “Physical and Mathematical Analysis of the Pentagon Crash” by Gerard Holmgren. The
obvious importance of what truly happened at the Pentagon is the fate of American Airlines
Flight 77 and its passengers. If Flight 77 didn’t hit the Pentagon then what happened to this flight
and the people on it? I wish I can answer this but I can only show the evidence that they didn’t
die in a fiery crash at the Pentagon.
The basic conclusions of these reports are as follows. Holmgren writes:
…the wings never contacted the [Pentagon] wall. They certainly did not
pass through. The hole is 60 ft too narrow, leaving 30 ft of each wing that cannot
have passed through. And there is no evidence of any damage to the sides of the
hole that would indicate contact of this type. If the wings did hit the wall, they
can’t have simply bounced off, without leaving any damage to the wall, while
simultaneously cremating themselves from the force of the impact….
1747
Holgrem was obviously basing his analysis on pictures of the Pentagon after there was a
collapse and not on the initial 16 foot hole. Despite this his analysis is valid. While there is no
evidence the wings hit the wall, further engineering analysis shows the wings could not have
folded and entered the building along with the fuselage, it was structurally impossible. As an
example, Dewdney and Longspaugh suggest trying the following:
Try folding any material, say a piece of cardboard, by applying it's edge
(not it's surface) to a tabletop. Folding horizontally is not an option, since all the
spars would be lined up in opposing (momentarily) the folding force.
1748
It is also a fact that the connection between the wings and the fuselage is the strongest
point on the plane. The wings didn't break off or fold when then the planes hit the WTC's and
they wouldn't have if a plane hit the pentagon. The wings did not and could not have
disintegrated either. Neither could the heat from the fire have melted the entire wings, even
under perfect ideal conditions.
1749
So where’s the debris? Dewdney and Longspaugh make the
following comment on debris:
It can be adopted as a general, commonsense principle that if a large, wide
and heavy object, moving at a speed of hundreds of kilometers an hour strikes but
does not pass through a physical barrier, it must remain on the side of the barrier
it struck. Although, large, heavy objects may be destroyed or damaged by such
impacts, neither they nor their debris vanish after such an event.
Wings that should have been sheared off by the impact are entirely absent.
There is also substantial evidence of debris from a much smaller, jet-powered
aircraft inside the building. We conclude with a high degree of certainty that no
Boeing 757 struck the building.
1750
Also conspicuously missing were the huge jet engines. The Boeing 757 uses a Pratt and
 |